Hmm...

Nov. 6th, 2008 10:04 am
madshutterbug: (c)2009 by Myself (Expostulation)
Just a thought, which is the higher Law? From the U.S. Constitution:

Amendment 9 - Construction of Constitution. Ratified 12/15/1791.

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.


Does this, being at a Federal Level, outweigh the rights of the States to so amend their own Constitutions?

My Voice

Nov. 4th, 2008 05:08 pm
madshutterbug: (c)2009 by Myself (Expostulation)
I dun raised it. Ballot cast and in the box.

Photographic proof will be available fairly soon, though on Flickr first.
madshutterbug: (c)2009 by Myself (Expostulation)
They are exemplars of polite. I realise I need not explain this to the Southern Ladies who are on my reading list, but perhaps to some of the other folk. Politeness, you see, is a Southern Thing. One does not, can not live here for any length of time and not learn this. Even one such as myself, born and raised above the Mason-Dixon will learn this. Oh, there are a few who may not, and they are known as Those Damn Yankees. Doesn't matter, in fact, if one comes from Out West or even some other country all together. Don't learn Polite, y'all are Damn Yankees.

Now, do not confuse Polite with non-threatening. If one should commit a mortal offense upon a Southern Lady, she will continue to be exquisitely polite even as she stabs the offender to death or shoots them down dead. This is, in fact, the trait I'm discussing this morning. Because our next door neighbor, Ms. Peggy, is a Southern Lady. Some about here become confused about this because Ms. Peggy is also a Hippie, dyed in the wool and unrepentant. Again, the Southern Ladies on my list will see no contradiction in this, simply because Southern Ladies may also be quite iron-willed and unmovable. Politely unmovable, to be sure.

There's been a lot of this going on, reports in the news so it's not only a local phenomenon. People put up their campaign support signs for their candidates of choice, someone else comes along and defaces, destroys, or removes them altogether. This is not restricted to any one political party either. I'm not saying the political candidates themselves support these actions, only that they are happening.

And Ms. Peggy put up her sign supporting the candidate of her choice.

You'll notice no doubt that I'm not mentioning candidates by name. That truly is not the most significant aspect of this story. I've said I don't talk politics, but this year proved me wrong on too many occasions so now I say I won't discuss politics. Even this isn't really a political thing, because as mentioned the reports are not restricting this vandalism to any one party. It is happening.

I suppose, really, it always does to some extent.

At any rate, Ms. Peggy put her sign up, and then it disappeared. So she put up another sign, home made, in the same place. Being home made, it is actually a lot more prominent than the original, which came from candidate headquarters.

Outbound on our road, one reads:
Where Is Our Sign?

Inbound, one reads:
Are [candidate] Supporters Thieves?

Put the two together, and, well, whoever took Ms. Peggy's sign would of done their candidate a bigger favour by leaving it alone.
madshutterbug: (c)2009 by Myself (RN Self Teacher)
Via the American Nurses Association:

nursingworld.org/gova/obama

Vote

Sep. 30th, 2008 06:59 am
madshutterbug: (c)2009 by Myself (Expostulation)
I probably saw the first new report on the outcome of the House vote on the bailout package legislation. Not claiming I saw it first, but probably, I saw the first one. Because it's pertinent to further discussion, and because I would do this eventually anyway, I followed a link to the Congressional Record for the results of the roll call.

Around now, I expect, those of you who've known me for a length of time (longer in this specific incidence by several months, but mostly I'm referring to several years at least to realise just how uncharacteristic this is) are thinking, holy cow [livejournal.com profile] madshutterbug is making his third politically related posting in possibly that many months. He never talks politics. I guess a more accurate statement even for me to make is I don't discuss politics. Evidence: once again, I've disable comments. If you know me well enough, you know how to let me know what you think.

So here we are, facing a huge economic crisis. And just in case anyone things I'm being quite provincial in my thinking, I've seen nothing, absolutely nothing in any news reporting to lead me to think this wee little boring crisis is confined to the geopolitical borders of my fair country. Great Britain is dealing with bank failures, the Russian stock market is in a tailspin along with most everyone else, keep going further along the verbal line of travel here and you can find that the Far East stock markets are wondering just what hit them as well. Therefor, this legislation is, truly, critical and monumental.

Which, of course, means that the CongressCritters involved in it start tossing around things like hey, it all got partisan in the end, that's why it failed.

Really?

It's true, I don't discuss politics, or the way I most often say it I don't talk politics. I do talk to politicians. This is something that started when we purchased our little corner of the universe and started paying taxes on it. Because of the local tax structure that means mostly I talked with local and state politicians. This escalated to talking to national politicians in 2001 when I got involved in some lobbying efforts by AORN to seek Medicare/Medicaid reimbursement for Certified Registered Nurse First Assistants (CRNFA). The biggest lesson in this for all of us is this: We hired these folks (regardless of where one lives, so long as one votes in an election, this is true) to work for us. It's their job. Every set number of years, they go through another 'job interview' to get re-hired or not, depending on their job performance.

And the only way they can know what to do, to do their job, is talk to the folks at home. One of the things I learned in that process is both how effective they can be by phoning/writing/e-mailing their representatives, and how apathetic most constituents are in not doing so. At least here in my fair country, Congressional Representatives and Senators generally figure that for each individual contact from someone 'back home' there are 100 more constituents who feel the same way. That's right, folks, the ratio of How Folks Feel is 100:1.

Now I know for sure that two people I know through LJ here contacted their Congress Critters. I know because one of you put up a copy of your letter, and I did. Due to that vociferous nature of the crowd I read, I expect there are at least three more of you who did so as well. That's five of us. That's 500 folk heard from, as far as the Congress Critters are concerned. Those are just the numbers I'm fairly confident about. I expect, actually, that this subject caused a huge number of people to contact their Congress Critters, I do, and I expect that influenced the outcome of this vote.

Back to the roll call, because of all that pointing and claiming It's All Your Fault. One of those claims is quoted as saying there were a dozen other Republicans ready to vote yes on this legislation and that partisan politics spoiled that.

A. Dozen. That's, um... 12. With a majority of the Nays being Republicans (2/3 of the R CongressCritters). And the bill went down to defeat, folks, by the huge, overwhelming margin of 23 votes. That's right, 23 more CongressCritters said Nay on behalf of their constituents than said Yea, and there were less than a handful of Abstains.

Let's see, 23 minus 12 is... 11. Those dozen 'on the fence' Republican votes would of made the difference in this particular bill passing, yeeee - Not So Much. And for the claim that it would, well, like one of my friends who lives in that Orange County on the other West Coast says, I call Bullshit.

Yes, something needs to be done to get the whole wide world over this economic trainwreck waiting to happen. And several of the people who in my estimation are contributory factors in that train being on the way to this derailment told us hey, trust us just one more time to do what needs to be done, without any oversight or controls. And it was close, Oh My Children, it was close, but the Word is No. Not that way. Needs some differences yet.
madshutterbug: (c)2009 by Myself (Expostulation)
Since I've said before (and will again, I'm sure) that I don't normally partake in political discussion, this post may come as a surprise. Two things: I refer once again to 'don't normally', and point out that this isn't a discussion. If you don't believe me on the latter, just look around for the response options.

I am full of questions. Not even offering any answers, I plan merely to put some of those questions out here so as to ease the discomfort of too many questions. I've been hearing for how many years now, certainly longer than the Reagan years, that the G.O.P. is the party for less government involvement and letting business take care of business. There's definitely a good deal of evidence for that during the Reagan years, with deregulation of various business concerns such as transportation and telecommunications and, even, some financial institutions... which led to a crisis in the Savings and Loan field.

There's a deal more evidence for that deregulation in the past eight years, particularly on environmental concerns that would bring a financial impact on large business', amongst others notably the power industry (coal-fired generation plants), as well. Plus, the SEC apparently encouraged to do less oversight in a number of areas (energy again, can you say Enron?). This worked fine to promote the message that the economy is doing well, just look at housing sales and new housing starts.

And let us not forget another aspect of example: Let's live on credit! By this I mean we are being told by the current Occupant, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue that we are in a war. We are fighting this war on multiple fronts, most noticeably two in particular. Now, wars are expensive parties, folks, as a lot of what is used is intended to be expendable. Thrown away. Watch it go Boom, quite literally.

But let's not pay for this now, eh? Let's not raise taxes for revenue to pay for those expendable items, which are needed to do this little thing, in fact let's cut taxes making a big public brough-ha-ha about that very act. Though most of the tax cutting is for those same big business' (some of which are making the expendables but by no means all) in order to promote their ability to do business, which they are doing... overseas.

So now I wonder, I do. Now there's not one, not two, but three specific bail-out events for large investment/mortgage concerns. Now there's a plan announced to establish a taxpayer-supported fund to cover the other risky investment business'. I've got to wonder, just why is this happening with the support of an Administration that says 'Stay out of business, let business take care of itself and all will be well?' Why, yes, the Democrats now control the House and Senate; look closer at those numbers, though and you will see that the margins are not so large there.

Still. Let business take care of itself which includes that principle: You invest in high risk and accept the responsibility and consequences. Which may well be a large profit payoff. And may well be a large loss. So now there are business' which are 'too big to allow to fail?' Every year when I submit my tally sheets to the IRS, there are two forms (one for the Art Photography business, one for teh Ranch) on there with a checkbox: 'Are all assets of this business at risk?' Every year they are checked, 'Yes'. Maybe I should submit my business' to this new fund for a bailout? Don't look to me to be turning blue holding my breath waiting on that one, folks.

What about all those mutterings about questionable profits made by companies which received un-contested contracts to support those military actions in those two places I mentioned? Just in which investment companies were those profits invested?

Yes, that's what I've got. Questions. No answers.

And now I've got some other things to do, and a few other concerns about the day. I'm not sure I'll be posting again for a bit. I'm hearing some strange noises from over by the Bro's dens...

May 2020

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 11th, 2025 06:40 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios