madshutterbug (
madshutterbug) wrote2008-02-05 09:51 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
In International Support
The link on the Google page is headed with 'Reuter's Oddly Enough', but to me this is not Odd at all. It's something much in need in the place and time:
China Provides Embattled Nurses with Bill of Rights ... link should open in a new window.
China Provides Embattled Nurses with Bill of Rights ... link should open in a new window.
no subject
However, because I'm also one to immediately look at edge cases, I hope that "impeding a nurse in the performance of his/her duties" will not be used to criminally charge people who are in an altered state of consciousness due to pain, shock, trauma, mental illness, etc. and are therefore flailing or uncommunicative or whatever.
no subject
The differences once that condition came under control are remarkable. Would this be diagnosed as soon as it was were the environment one which held to the attitude, 'They're just nurses, they're supposed to be abused?'
no subject
no subject
We also may be the first ones to face frustration and anger on the part of patients and/or family (not really much difference in such situations) related either to the experience in the 'System' itself, or with an unpleasant (undesirable/unexpected) outcome. We take that as a given, and learning how to deal with it is, or should be, a component of nursing education. We do not take as a given that abusive expression of such anger is justifiable, which is why being able to tell the difference between such abuse, and health care condition induced behaviour, is as important as you state.